Trial Advocacy Team from the Massachusetts School of Law at Andover Advances to the Semifinals and its other team ties for 4th at the 2008 New England Regionals of the American Association for Justice Trial Competition in Boston
Massachusetts School of Law’s Trial Advocacy Program advanced a team to the semifinals while its other team tied for 4th place at the American Association for Justice regional competition held in Boston and Cambridge. MSL’s 4th place team did not advance to the semifinals as it narrowly lost the tiebreaker through total points scored of 214-209. Teams from law schools throughout New England as well as the University of Baltimore Law School competed in the New England regional matches of the American Association for Justice Trial Competition to determine which team would advance to the national finals in West Palm Beach in April.
Two teams from MSL competed at the regional competition that took place in Boston and Cambridge. Team members are Matt Lallier, Lisa Gilman, Jesse Burch, Lonnie McCaffrey, Lisa Ferreira, Victoria Dickinson, John Kimball, David Jaffe, Debra LaCamera and Heidi Porter. The teams faced stiff competition throughout the competition, especially from the University of Connecticut Law School, which won the competition in both 2005 and 2006, and from Suffolk University Law School.
Suffolk University Law School prevailed in the semifinals over MSL team members Matt Lallier, Lisa Gilman, Jesse Burch and Lonnie McCaffrey. Suffolk University Law School went on to win the competition. MSL’s team that tied for fourth place was comprised of Victoria Dickinson, Lisa Ferreira, David Jaffe, and John Kimball. Professor Anthony Copani and Associate Dean Michael Coyne head MSL’s Trial Advocacy Program and they coached the teams along with Professor Dan Harayda and Professor Robert Armano.
MSL’s teams displayed a mastery of the law and rules of evidence in a negligence/medical malpractice trial. MSL’s teams demonstrated outstanding advocacy skills in presenting both the Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s case. In praising the team’s performance, Professor Copani said that he was “pleased that the team could present such a compelling case in such as thoughtful and persuasive way. Their mastery of the art of advocacy was impressive. As their professor, I stand in awe of their talents.”
Dean Coyne said, “The School is very proud of our teams’ efforts and the success this year of MSL’s Trial Advocacy Program. It is a pleasure to see this team do so well, as I know how hard they worked to achieve success. It is very well deserved. The entire faculty and administration are pleased in knowing that no matter where are students go to participate against other law schools, be it Newark, Boston, Cambridge or in Detroit or Washington in the spring, that our students will continue to excel and demonstrate their skills and the strengths of MSL’s educational program. We are enormously proud of them.”
The entire Massachusetts School of Law community congratulates the team on its performance at the 2008 AAJ Trial Competition!
Massachusetts School of Law's mission is to provide an academically rigorous affordable legal education emphasizing ethics, advocacy, leadership, and professional skills. MSLAW provides an accessible and affordable legal education to tomorrow’s leaders in law, business, and technology who seek to contribute to their communities as advocates, lawyers, and leaders. Lawyers have substantial influence in our society and MSLAW prepares its graduates to use that power to help their clients and obtain the societal advancement that a law degree has traditionally provided.
To accomplish its mission, Massachusetts School of Law brings together a diverse group of scholars, judges, expert practitioners and other professionals to provide individuals from all backgrounds a rigorous, professionally advantageous, affordable legal education so that they can improve their lives and better serve their communities.
The Massachusetts School of Law does not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, national or ethnic origin, age, gender, sexual orientation, marital or parental status, disability, source of income, or status as a Vietnam-era or disabled veteran admission to, access to, treatment in, or employment in its programs and activities.